Structured submission
Move course information into the configured review process.
Digital academic governance
iFAMS · Academic Council System
Bring academic course review into a structured digital workflow.
Connect course owners, Board of Studies reviewers, Academic Council participants, and the Principal through role-based actions, documented feedback, and clearer workflow progress.
Course submissionBOS reviewAcademic CouncilPrincipal decision
Why iFAMS
A clearer path from submission to decision
Academic review involves multiple roles and stages. iFAMS helps organise the workflow in one role-based process.
Academic feedback
Keep available comments and recommendations connected to the submission.
Role-based actions
Present tasks and actions according to the user’s role and assignment.
Workflow history
Help authorised users follow recorded progress and decisions.
Workflow at a glance
From course owner to Principal
Stages and actions depend on institutional configuration and user permissions.
1
Teacher / Course Owner
Prepares and submits the course.
2
BOS Chairman
Reviews and may assign BOS Member feedback.
3
BOS Members
Provide feedback when assigned.
4
Academic Council Chairman
Considers course information and available BOS history.
5
Advisory review
Academic Council Members may provide feedback.
6
Principal
Reviews and approves or returns with remarks.
Academic Council Member reviews are advisory. The Chairman may act on available information without waiting for every assigned member.
See the workflow in action.
Arrange an institutional walkthrough to explore course submission, review stages, routing decisions, and status tracking.